<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Risk, Transparency, and Secrecy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulwilkinson.com/2009/03/02/risk-transparency-and-secrecy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulwilkinson.com/2009/03/02/risk-transparency-and-secrecy/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on policy, business, disclosure, and communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulWilkinson</title>
		<link>http://paulwilkinson.com/2009/03/02/risk-transparency-and-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulWilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulwilkinson.com/?p=381#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t see the NY Times article until you pointed it out -- thanks!  I have two of Frank Partnoy&#039;s books on my bookshelf.  Wish there had been time to study his work more carefully four years ago. Thumbing through them now only reinforces my opinion that better disclosure at the ground level could have prevented the house of cards.Of course, it would have prevented a lot of market incumbent profit, too, which I expect was responsible for the fact that Partnoy&#039;s warnings went unheeded. Will be interesting to see what William Cohan&#039;s take is -- my copy of House of Cards is supposed to arrive tomorrow. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#039;t see the NY Times article until you pointed it out &#8212; thanks!  I have two of Frank Partnoy&#039;s books on my bookshelf.  Wish there had been time to study his work more carefully four years ago. Thumbing through them now only reinforces my opinion that better disclosure at the ground level could have prevented the house of cards.Of course, it would have prevented a lot of market incumbent profit, too, which I expect was responsible for the fact that Partnoy&#039;s warnings went unheeded. Will be interesting to see what William Cohan&#039;s take is &#8212; my copy of House of Cards is supposed to arrive tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunir_Kapoor</title>
		<link>http://paulwilkinson.com/2009/03/02/risk-transparency-and-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-2254</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunir_Kapoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulwilkinson.com/?p=381#comment-2254</guid>
		<description>Paul, 
 
Did you see this op-ed contribution in the NY Times? Its arguing the same points you are: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/16/opinion/16partnoy.html?_r=1&amp;th&amp;emc=th&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/16/opinion/16partn...&lt;/a&gt; 
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, </p>
<p>Did you see this op-ed contribution in the NY Times? Its arguing the same points you are: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/16/opinion/16partnoy.html?_r=1&amp;th&amp;emc=th" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/16/opinion/16partn.." rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/16/opinion/16partn..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
